Summary Series: Homo Deus - P1, Ch2

Posted on July 18, 2018 by Janey Muñoz
Tags: nonfiction, Homo Deus, reading, summary, modern-thinkers

Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari

Part 1: Homo sapiens Conquers the World, Chapter 2: The Anthropocene


The current epoch of history is commonly referred to as the Holocene period, yet the more appropriate term for the period is perhaps Antrhopocene. It is the first time that the earth could be thought of as a single ecological unit, as the globalism of modern society has united previously disparate groups. This mindset is quite different from that of our hunter-gather ancestors, who likely did not think of people outside of their band regularly, and if they did, it was in the context of them being as outsiders. The current mindset, that bands and individuals of widely ranging localities and backgrounds can find common-ground, is a new outlook that we are just beginning to delve into. The main takeaway from such ideas is that humans are flexible, and evolution has equipped them to rally around collective imagined ideas, or intersubjective ideas, that ultimately allow Homo sapiens to be the ruling animal of modern Earth.

A notable aspect of the mammalian, and thus Homo sapiens makeup is its its emotional ability and need. These emotions can be thought of as algorithms that allow a creature to respond effectively instinctually to stimuli, originating from millions of years of trial and error, and ultimately allowing for the propagation of its genes.

99 per cent of our decisions - including the most important life choices concerning spouses, careers and habitats - are made by highly refined algorithms we call sensations, emotions and desires.

It may be simple enough to observe that humans are the alpha-predator on this planet, but what is it that how can we deny that other animals are wholly lesser than Homo sapiens?

The expulsion from Eden bears a striking resemblance to the Agricultural Revolution. Instead of allowing Adam to keep gathering wild fruits, an angry god condemns him to ‘eat only by the bread by the sweat of your brow’. It might be no coincidence, then, that biblical animals spoke with humans only in the pre-agricultural era of Eden.

Well, the answer is not so clear. In times past, humans justified their actions with the idea that a god had given humans reign over animals; however, modern atheist thinkers find this mindset to be lacking. Modern thinkers may still indeed subscribe to human exceptionalism over other animals, but likely have a hard time fully justifying why. The current common dogma around human exceptionalism is based on liberal principles, which gives individual humans the utmost importance despite their actual value.

More Quotes

… one core emotion is apparently shared by all mammals: the mother-infant bond.

Theist religions rewrote the script, turning the universe into a bleak Ibsen drama with just two characters: man and god.

The Fine Print

These summaries are meant to be just that, a condensation of another person's time, effort, and thoughts. What these summaries are not is an endorsement of the ideas being espoused by the work's author. My belief is that one can learn from all perspectives, even (and perhaps especially) from those with which we disagree. My motivation in writing the summaries is twofold: to dedicate time in achieving the greatest understand of the work, and to reflect upon the new information, perhaps better concretizing it in my mind. A possible additional benefit is to you, the reader, who I can only hope may be nudged toward trying a new book, or at least pondering on some of the discussed ideas.
Please feel free to take a look at my goodreads account for more on what I am reading.